Sunday, January 27, 2008

BIRDS, BULLIES, AND BAD TIMES

In This Issue:

- SOME BAKER CITY BIRDS IN WINTER
- PALESTINIAN-ISRAELI CONFLICT & THE SIEGE OF GAZA
- IT’S THE CORRUPTION, STUPID!
- IRAQ: KILLING AS IF WE WERE MORAL, SPENDING AS IF WE WERE RICH

SOME BAKER CITY BIRDS IN WINTER

With the unrelenting cold and snowfall this month, my feeders are crowded
with some of our winter resident birds looking for a life-sustaining
handout. Among the more common birds here are house finches, the
introduced house sparrows, dark-eyed juncos, mountain and black-capped
chickadees, pine siskins and American goldfinches. Their grim situation
has afforded me an enhanced opportunity to photograph a few of them, so
I will share them with you.

Goldfinches (Carduelis tristis) were a very rare occurrence where I grew up in California, and I really don’t remember seeing any until I lived part-time in west central Utah, where they were referred to by my neighbors as wild canaries.

Male American Goldfinch in Winter Suit at Nyger Thistle Feeder.

Goldfinches eat seeds from members of the sunflower family, like dandelions and ornamental sunflowers, introduced weeds, as well as seeds and buds from birch and elm (among others). They can often be found feeding in clumps of teasel in winter and will usually eat from feeders containing fresh nyger thistle seed. The bird in the photo above is beginning to lose some winter feathers where his summertime black cap is coming in (breeding plumage).

Another irregularly occurring finch, the pine siskin (Carduelis pinus,
photo below) aggressively seeks out thistle feeders in winter. Its
normal fare ranges from the seeds of weeds to those of birch, alder and
various conifers . Its narrow, pointed beak is particularly suited to
these chores. They are common in some years, and absent, or nearly so,
in others.

Pine Siskin above shows typical yellow lining of wing primary feathers.

The most common finch around Baker City feeders in winter is the house finch, Carpodacus mexicanus (below). The large powerful beak makes quick work of eating larger seeds and berries, but it is also a valuable feeder on smaller weed seeds as well.

Male House Finch (above) with typical red "forehead" and breast above brown streaked belly and flanks.

The handsome dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis, photo below), the common Oregon variety of which is named the Oregon junco, can be attracted by throwing “wild bird seed” millet mixes out on the ground or on a flat open feeder placed on a pole or attached to the house by a window. It is usually found in open woods in the spring and summer seasons. Other varieties, such as the slate-colored junco, also appear here. They normally have gray, rather than buffy, sides.

Dark-eyed “Oregon” Junco with typical black "hood," buff brown flanks and white belly.

Along with the mountain chickadee shown in the last blog, the back-capped chickadee sometimes finds its way to Baker City feeders. Like the Mountain, it is friendly/fearless to the point of foolishness, and its sprightly acrobatics and handsome suit, cheer up the most dreary winter day. It closely inspects trees and shrubs looking for insects and berries, often hanging upside down from branches, but forages for seeds as well. At feeders it likes black-oil sunflower seeds and suet.

Back-capped Chickadee (above) with typical buffy flanks, lacks the white "eyebrow" seen on the mountain chickadee.

Another bird that may be found lurking around feeders is the sharp-shinned hawk (Accipiter striatus) It is our smallest Accipiter:i.e., raptors with long tails and short-wings. They are very quick and agile in their pursuit of small birds through trees and shrubs. Parents teach the young to catch birds in flight by tossing food to them in mid-air. These raptors will also catch small birds thrown to them by humans, not that anyone would do that. The bird pictured below thins out the non-native house sparrow population around my place, but they are not too picky about which small bird species they select for dinner.

Young Sharp-shinned Hawk--looking good and ever wary.

Lastly, below is a picture of our smallest falcon, the American kestrel (Falco sparverius). Falcons generally exhibit purposeful, powerful and fast flight with somewhat narrow and pointed wings. This bird used to be called sparrow hawk, but normally feeds on small rodents and larger insects like grasshoppers. They can be found with bobbing tail onpowerlines or hovering over potential prey in open areas. It nests in cavities excavated by woodpeckers or other cavity like spaces, including those found in the walls of old barns. This one was suffering the cold winds on a cloudy New Year’s Day at Ladd Marsh (2008).

American Kestrel enduring a bitter cold wind on New Year's Day.

(I had hoped to show more cacti at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument,
but this blog is already too lengthy so I will do them next time.)

PALESTINIAN-ISRAELI CONFLICT

Between January 15th and 19th, during the siege of Gaza, Israeli State terrorists killed at least 28 Palestinians and injured about 90 more, most of whom were civilians. 115 Palestinians have been killed since world leaders gathered for Bush’s farcical Annapolis “peace talks” in November of 2007. Israel accomplished these deeds with tanks, rockets, and American supplied F-16s against un-armed or lightly armed people. This killing spree was in response to the firing of primitive and inaccurate homemade Kassam rockets at the nearby town of Siderot in Israel. From the beginning of the 2nd intifada in September 0f 2000, to the 19th of January, 2008, 10 or 12 Israelis had been killed by the firing of these rockets (figures differ). No one had been killed this year, and only 2 people had been killed in 2007.

According to the Palestinian Center for Human Rights, since the beginning of the 2nd intifada:

“3534 Palestinians Civilians have been killed by Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) forces in the OPT. [OPT = Palestinian Occupied Territories]

A further 928 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) in armed clashes in the OPT.

11300 Palestinians have been wounded by Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) in the Gaza Strip since the beginning of the Intifada.

13450 Palestinians have been wounded by Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) in the West Bank territory since the beginning of the Intifada.

Over 800 of the dead were children, 142 were women.

Israeli state terrorists killed 372 of these people, many of whom were innocent bystanders, while attempting extra-judicial assassinations of people they said were involved in various “crimes” of resistance to Israeli occupation. There is no right to a kangaroo court when Israel makes you a suspect in the occupied territories.

On the other hand, Palestinians have killed 705 Israeli civilians and 325 Israeli security personnel during the same time period.

Checkout Ali Abunimah on “Democracy Now” :
<”The United States is complicit. And, by the way, Amy, this is another
setback for the Bush Doctrine. The people of Gaza have been the victims
of an experiment by the Bush administration and Israel, where, first of
all, they had a democratic election [Hamas won! Chris]. The US and Israel didn’t like that
result, so they tried to overthrow Hamas using Contra-style militias
and using a starvation siege. Hamas turned the tables on them and got
rid of those militias. So they decided to tighten the siege on the
people of Gaza, and the people of Gaza decided to break out of it
themselves.”> Ali Abunimah


Palestinians surge into Egypt after knocking down Israeli built ghetto fence reminiscent of the Berlin Wall (Al Jazeera photo)

“Gazans are still subject to the control of the Israeli military which retains the ability and right to enter the Gaza Strip at will. Furthermore, Israel retains control over all of Gaza's public utilities, airspace, sea shore, and borders, including Gaza's border with Egypt. It is Israel that both sets and collects Gaza's taxes and customs [and often withholds them from the Palestinians-Chris]and controls its population registry. It controls Gaza's international relations, whether or not they can open a seaport or an airport, and continues its military activity along the GazaStrip's coastline. Taken together, these powers mean that all goods, services and people entering or leaving Gaza are subject to Israeli control.”
Quote above from: Q&A: The Occupation in Law
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/17CCDB3E-3E53-4CF5-8B20-33A63A30EF65.htm

Gazans bring supplies back to their open-air prison from Egypt after knocking down one of Israel's border walls. (Electricintifada.net photo)

POP QUIZ ON THE PALESTINIAN – ISRAELI CONFLICT

1) True or False—The West Bank and Jerusalem are occupied by Israel, but the Gaza Strip is no longer occupied.

2) True or False—Israel’s ongoing, open-ended occupation is legal.

3) True or False—Israel’s ever-expanding settlements on occupied Palestinian land are legal.

4) True or False—The Palestinians and Hamas have the right to defend themselves and to resist Israel’s occupation and war crimes.

Since the beginning of the second Intifada in September of 2000, to the end
of 2007, Israel has killed around 3500 civilians (estimates vary),
including over 800 children. The Palestinians have killed 234 Israeli
civilians and 39 children.

5) True or False—Killing civilians and children is legal under international law.

During the same period, often using US supplied rockets and aircraft, Israel
killed 272 Palestinians during attempted extra-judicial assassination
attempts, including the wheelchair bound former Hamas leader Sheikh Ahmed Yassin.

6) True or False— Extra-judicial assassinations, aka, “targeted killings,” are legal under international law.

7) What is it called when Israel punishes the entire population of Gaza for the actions of a few resistance fighters?

8) True or False—Under the Geneva conventions, collective punishment by occupiers is illegal.

9) True or False—The U.N. Human Rights Council recently blasted Israel for the siege of Gaza.

10) How often does NPR’s Israel reporter, Linda Gradstein, offer a report on the conflict that isn’t biased in favor of Israel?

11) True or False—The population densities of the Nazi controlled Warsaw Ghetto (at its worst) and the “Beach” (Life’s a Beach!) Palestinian refugee camp in the Gaza Strip are about the same.

12) True or False—Most Americans could give a rat’s ass whether Palestinians suffer or die as a result of US and Israeli criminal behavior. Many are more concerned about the money they have to spend to drive around in their tank-like pickups than they are about the death and destruction our weapons and foreign policy spread around the globe.

Answers: 1 FALSE, 2 FALSE, 3 FALSE, 4 TRUE, 5 FALSE, 6 FALSE, 7 Collective punishment, 8 TRUE, 9 TRUE, The resolution, adopted by a vote of 30-1 in Geneva, called for "urgent international action to put an immediate end to the grave violations committed by the occupying power, Israel, in the occupied Palestinian territory.", 10 NEVER, she seems to be incapable of offering and objective undistorted report!, 11 TRUE, population density for both was/is around 1 person for each 130 square feet (10x13 foot rectangle). 12 TRUE Americans are brainwashed and otherwise misled by the mainstream media, their political leaders who are in the pocket of the Israel Lobby, their religious leaders who are enthralled by fantasies and the holocaust industry, and by a politicized educational system. Many have been led to believe that their most noble roles are to consume as much as possible, be otherwise entertained, believe in and pray to an invisible friend, and blame the victims.

For discussion of questions 1-6, see: Q&A: The Occupation in Law
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/17CCDB3E-3E53-4CF5-8B20-33A63A30EF65.htm

IT’S THE CORRUPTION, STUPID!
Our current financial crisis, a follow-up act to the savings and loan
scandal and the technology bubble-bust, has been brewing since the late
90’s, and became inevitable during the reign of King George W. Its
roots have been nourished by the deregulation dogma begun in the Carter
administration and made a holy writ during the union busting regime of
master salesman and heartless bully, Ronald Reagan. Bill Clinton, the
face of the Democratic Leadership Council, along with his financial
advisor and Treasury Secretary, Robert Rubin (Goldman Sachs,Citigroup,
etc.), all but turned over the economic reigns to Wall Street, while
loosening conflict of interest regulations that had helped to keep the
financial scampsters on a long leash. War criminal George W. Bush
ignored the housing bubble while increasing the national debt by over
$3.5 TRILLION, or 62%, in 7 years. The 2006 trade deficit was double
that of 2000, the year Bush stole the Presidential election, and during
his time in office, over 3 million good manufacturing jobs have gone
overseas. Under G.W., energy prices have skyrocketed, credit card debt
has increased by almost half, total household debt, credit card and
mortgage, as a percent of the market value of total household assets is
at a new high, foreign-held debt has doubled, while the dollar is in
steep decline. The popping of the housing bubble, during which Wall
Street banker/traders made millions selling bad loans, and the ensuing
credit crunch, has left us in an ever-deepening financial crisis which
could lead to a variety of the “stagflation” we experienced in the
‘70s, if not a 21st century version of a depression. Bush and Congress
have concocted an inadequate and poorly targeted stimulus package that
will likely prove to be more politics, psychology and style than the
effective long-term reform necessary for rescuing the economy. There
are few politicians left in Congress who possess the sense of fairness,
compassion, intelligence and courage needed to reign in the bankers and
traders on Wall Street with new regulations.

Here are some interesting articles concerning the financial upheaval:

“Is This the Big One”
From Information Clearing House
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19126.htm

“Even the far-right Op-ed page of the Wall Street Journal conceded Greenspan's culpability in Saturday's edition…..

The Wall Street Journal admits that a new “structured debt” market was created to package dubious subprime liabilities (from “no doc”, no collateral, “bad credit” loan applicants) and sell them to hedge funds, insurance companies and foreign banks as if they were precious jewels. TheWSJ avers that this is the way that “smart people” “exploit” the opportunities from lavish “capital flows”.

But was it “smart” or criminal?

Fortunately, that question was answered this week in an extraordinary outburst on cable TV by market-insider and equities guru, JimCramer. In Cramer's latest explosion, he details his own involvement in creating and selling “structured products” which had never been stress-tested in a slumping market. No one knew how badly they would perform. Cramer admits that the motivation behind peddling this junk to gullible investors was simply greed. Here's his statement
:”
"ITS ALL ABOUT THE COMMISSION”
Cramer Rages on Banks: 'Where's the SEC?!'
http://www.cnbc.com/id/22706231
<”(We used to say) “The commissions on structured products are so huge let's JAM IT.” (note “jam it” means foist it on the customer) It's all about the 'commish'. The commission on structured product is GIGANTIC. I could make a fortune 'JAMMING THAT CRUMMY PAPER' but I had a degree of conscience---what a shocker!--We used to regulate people but they decided during the Reagan revolution that that was bad. So we don't regulate anyone anymore. But listen the commission in structured product is so gigantic. (pause) First of all the customer has no idea what the product really is because it is invented. Second, you assume the customer is really stupid; like we used to say about the German bankers, 'The German banks are just Bozos. Throw them anything.' Or the Australians 'M O R O N S' Or the Florida Fund (ha ha ) “They're so stupid let's give them Triple B (junk grade) Then we'd just laugh and laugh at the customers and Jam them with the commission...That's what happened; that's what happened....Remember, this is about commissions, about how much money you can make by jamming stupid customers. I've seen it all my life; you jam stupid customers.”
See the whole damning confession on
: http://www.cnbc.com/id/22706231

”Trillions of dollars in structured investments (CDOs, MBSs, an ASCP) have now clogged up the global economic system and are dragging the world headlong into recession/depression. Cramer's confession is a candid admission of criminal intent to defraud the public by selling products which people--within the financial industry---KNEW were falsely represented by their ratings. They sold them simply to fatten their own paychecks and because there is no longer any regulatory agency within the US government that curtails ilicit activity.”
AND
Economics Journalist Robert Kuttner on the “Most Serious Financial Crisis Since the Great Depression”: “This is the Result of Rightwing Ideology and the Political Power of Wall Street”
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/1/23/recession

Amy Goodman: The solutions now—the Fed interest-rate cut, the stimulus package—is this enough, Robert Kuttner?
ROBERT KUTTNER: No, it’s not the beginning of enough. And I think the place to start is to recognize why this recession is different from all other recessions. This began and is continuing with a collapse in credit markets, and the collapse in credit markets is, in turn, the result of deregulation gone nuts. And it’s a repeat of a lot of things that happened in the 1920s, where there was too much speculation with too much borrowed money and a complete lack of transparency. The regulators, the public had no idea of what these bonds that had been created out of subprime mortgages really contained, what they were worth. The people who packaged them were not subject to any kind of regulatory scrutiny.
. . . .
This did not just happen. This was not an accident. This was the agenda of business, particularly Wall Street, going back thirty years. And if you look at the history of this, the Great Depression discredited free-market ideology, because it was such a colossal practical failure. Nobody in the 1930s could argue with a straight face that free markets worked.

And so, we had a whole mixed economy, a regulatory structure invented during the New Deal, that really lasted thirty or forty years. By the ’70s, for a variety of reasons, big business had recovered a lot of the political power that it had lost in the Depression. And both parties, beginning with Carter, continuing with Clinton, became enablers of the kind of deregulation that finally has come home to roost in this crisis. So now we’re learning, painfully, for a second time a lesson that we never should have had to learn twice, that markets don’t regulate themselves. Markets, left to their own devices, create grotesque inequality, ruin the environment and ruin the economy. And we’re seeing that unfold.
. . . .
. . . they need to hang this around the necks, not just of the Republican Party, not just around George W. Bush, but around the whole conservative ideology, because this economic mess is the gift that’s going to keep on giving, unfortunately, for years to come, of rightwing ideology put into practice in its most extreme form since Reagan. And that message, I think, has to keep getting out. This did not come out of thin air. This was not like a comet striking the earth. This was the result of rightwing ideology and the political power of Wall Street taking over the economy
.“>

Robert Reich | Darker Days Ahead?
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/012608F.shtml
<According to Robert Reich in Newsweek,
"Think the last few days have been bad for Wall Street and the rest of the world's markets? Hang on, things are probably going to get worse, says Robert Reich, President Clinton's former secretary of Labor and author of the recent book 'Supercapitalism: The Transformation of Business, Democracy and Everyday Life.' According to Reich, who currently teaches public policy at the University of California, Berkeley, the United States might even be headed toward a depression.
">

Hard Times A-Coming
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19133.htm

Neither Supply-Side Theory Nor Keynesian Remedies Can Save Us Now
http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts01222008.html

Also, from a new film, "Chalmers Johnson on American Hegemony," aka ("this is the way empires end”)
http://www.tomdispatch.com/p/chalmers_video
or view it at:
America – A Bankrupt Empire
http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=12259

IRAQ: KILLING AS IF WE WERE MORAL, SPENDING AS IF WE WERE RICH

January 23, 2008
U.S. War Costs In Iraq Up: Report
By REUTERS
WASHINGTON
(Reuters) - . . . . "Funding for U.S. operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and other activities in the war on terrorism expanded significantly in 2007," the Congressional Budget Office said in a report released on Wednesday. War funding, which averaged about $93 billion a year from 2003 through 2005, rose to $120
billion in 2006 and $171 billion in 2007 and President George W. Bush has asked for $193 billion in 2008, the nonpartisan office wrote. . . . . Since the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, Congress has written checks for $691 billion to pay for wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and such related activities as Iraq reconstruction, the CBO said.

More: http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/news/news-iraq-usa-spending.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

From ICH:
Number Of Iraqis Slaughtered Since The U.S. Invaded Iraq 1,168,058
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/iraq/iraqdeaths.html
Number of U.S. Military Personnel Sacrificed (Officially acknowledged) In America'sWar On Iraq 3,932
http://icasualties.org/oif/

Documenting How the Busies Lied the Country into War
The Center for Public Integrity web site documenting the lies that the Bush administration used to destroy so many lives:
http://www.publicintegrity.org/WarCard/

NY Times article on CPI's "False Pretenses" site:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/23/washington/23database.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=Web+Site+Assembles+U.S.+Prewar+Claims&st=nyt&oref=slogin

KUCINICH

Well, the media finally mentioned Kucinich the other day—when he dropped out of the “race” for president. Due to lack of media attention, many people didn’t even know he was running. Part of the solution is public financing for election campaigns, instant runoff voting, and reform of the primary system with something like regional primaries. We don't need the media and a small fraction of the American electorate telling us who will appear on the final ballot.

Wildflowers will be in next blog.

Saturday, December 22, 2007

Quotes for Your Soul & Merry Christmas!

In this edition:

Information Clearing House Freedom Quotes

Merry Christmas From John Lennon & Yoko Ono



Struggling National Symbol Wonders What We Have Become
(© Christopher Christie)

When one is overcome with “outrage fatigue,” it is sometimes helpful, or at least validating, to embrace the thoughts of those who came before. A good source of those thoughts is a news service such as Information Clearing House, which provides worthy quotes with every issue.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/

Please read the most recent offering:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Information Clearing House Newsletter
News You Won't Find On CNN
12/22/07

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"It is only when the people become ignorant and corrupt, when they degenerate into a populace, that they are incapable of exercising their sovereignty. Usurpation is then an easy attainment, and an usurper soon found. The people themselves become the willing instruments of their own debasement and ruin." -- James Monroe (1758-1831), 5th US President Source: First Inaugural Address, 1817

=
"Under every government the dernier [Fr. last, or final] resort of the people, is an appeal to the sword; whether to defend themselves against the open attacks of a foreign enemy, or to check the insidious encroachments of domestic foes. Whenever a people... entrust the defence of their country to a regular, standing army, composed of mercenaries, the power of that country will remain under the direction of the most wealthy citizens." -- A Framer - Anonymous 'framer' of the US Constitution Source: Independent Gazetteer, January 29, 1791

=
"He is free who lives as he wishes to live; who is neither subject to compulsion nor to hindrance, nor to force; whose movements to action are not impeded, whose desires attain their purpose, and who does not fall into that which he would avoid." -- Epictetus (ca 55-135 A.D.) Greek philospher Source: Discourses, ca 100 A.D.

=
"The only freedom deserving the name, is that of pursuing our own good in our own way, so long as we do not attempt to deprive others of theirs, or impede their efforts to obtain it. Each is the proper guardian of his own health, whether bodily, or mental and spiritual. Mankind are greater gainers by suffering each other to live as seems good to themselves, than by compelling each to live as seems good to the rest." -- John Stuart Mill - (1806-1873) English philosopher and economist Source: On Liberty, 1859

=
"Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone." -John Maynard Keynes, British economist

And from yesterday's edition:

"It belongs to human nature to hate those you have injured." Tacitus

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/
===

The Eagle Cap Wilderness and Baker County In Winter
(© Christopher Christie)

Oh, and Merry Christmas!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BAvAA53sLo

Some Steve Earle Lyrics:

Ashes to Ashes (dust to dust)

There was blood on their hands and a plague on the land
They drew a line in the sand and made their last stand
They said "God made us in his image
And it's in God that we trust"
When asked about the men that had died by their hands
They said "ashes to ashes and dust to dust"

Now, nobody lives forever
Nothin' stands the test of time
Oh, you heard 'em say "never say never"
But it's always best to keep it in mind
That every tower ever built tumbles
No matter how strong, no matter how tall
Someday even great walls will crumble
And every idol ever raised falls
And someday even man's best laid plans
Will lie twisted and covered in rust
When we've done all that we can but it slipped through our hands
And it's ashes to ashes and dust to dust


Amerika V. 6.0 (The Best We Can Do)

Look at ya
Yeah, take a look in the mirror now tell me what you see
Another satisfied customer in the front of the line for the American dream
I remember when we was both out on the boulevard
Talkin' revolution and singin' the blues
Nowadays it's letters to the editor and cheatin' on our taxes
Is the best that we can do
Come on

Look around
There's doctors down on Wall Street
Sharpenin' their scalpels and tryin' to cut a deal
Meanwhile, back at the hospital
We got accountants playin' God and countin' out the pills
Yeah, I know, that sucks that your HMO
Ain't doin' what you thought it would do
But everybody's gotta die sometime and we can't save everybody
It's the best that we can do

Four score and a hundred and fifty years ago
Our forefathers made us equal as long as we can pay
Yeah, well maybe that wasn't exactly what they was thinkin'
Version six-point-oh of the American way
. . . .
Yeah, I realize that ain't exactly democratic, but it's either them or us and
And it's the best we can do

Yeah, passionately conservative
It's the best we can do

Conservatively passionate
It's the best we can do

Meanwhile they’re still thinkin’ Hey--
Lets go blow up Iraq—I mean North Korea
I mean Syria, I mean Texas. . . .

Thursday, December 13, 2007

TNR Humane? - Wolf Reintroduction - Youchoose on Youtube

In this issue:

-Trap-Neuter-Release Program
-Resisting Delisting ~ Idaho's Wolves & Livestock's Influence - video
-Youchoose at Youtube
_______________________________________________

Is TNR A Humane Solution to the Feral Cat Problem?
Four years ago, I was a volunteer at a county animal shelter. It was a pretty unpleasant experience in many ways, but I enjoyed working with the abandoned, or otherwise abused pets. It was pleasing to find out that pitbulls can have a loving and endearing spirit, and it was satisfying to see a local person leave with a purring kitten or tail-wagging dog. I was truly saddened to find out why the fellow with the flatbed truck came in every two weeks to get those big black barrels out back. If, after a few weeks, an animal didn’t get a home, it ended up in one of the black barrels. It is a hard reality, that even as an adult, I didn’t want to face.

In recent times there has been a fairly successful effort to demonize those who favor time-tested methods of feral cat control. They have been relegated to the political and social sidelines by the “compassionately correct,” who have placed control of feral cats under the bureaucratized, “nanny state” government and NGO umbrella of so-called “humane” treatment. In that vein, over the last year or more there have been several articles in the local papers about our feral cat problem and the trap-neuter-release program (TNR). The last article that I am aware of that even hinted there might be any problem with feeding strays, or with TNR in general, was an August 2006 Herald article by Alex Pahunas, but no article that I am aware of, made a real effort to let readers know about the many negative aspects of TNR or about the debate that has been simmering for several years. In the last few weeks, there were two articles and two editorials promoting successes of the program. Both editorials suggested that the City Council was wrong to deny continued funding for the program, and one seemed to think that TNR was a humane solution, while implying that nothing less than Sainthood would do for the lead proponents of the program.

Feral Cat on Successful Hunt (AU.gov)

My reaction to the problem is that it is better than nothing, not particularly humane, and that it is not the best solution or the wisest use of resources. While it likely will reduce feral cat populations in the long run, it ignores a primary source of the problem: pet cats that are not neutered or spayed. It also ignores other important issues that are discussed below, not the least of which are deleterious effects on songbird populations and the problems released feral cats pose to taxpayers and other residents who are not particularly infatuated with them.

Most definitions of the word “humane” have to do with showing compassion, kindness and mercy towards other humans or animals. Some people have a pretty short list of the animals, or even humans, they have compassion and concern for. They can see themselves and others as humane if they refuse to euthanize cats, even if domestic and feral cats kill millions of birds, mammals, amphibians and reptiles every year, and even if some of these same people support American policies that have killed millions of innocent civilians around the globe. It is that kind of moral and ethical flexibility that makes life a breeze for some, and a bad dream for others.

Local proponents have promoted TNR as both humane and legal. Many studies over the last decade have questioned whether it is either, and I would add that it is not the most efficient use of taxpayer or other dollars.

While proponents claim that spaying or neutering feral cats and releasing them back into the wild is more humane than traditional methods involving euthanasia, opponents (yes, there are many), point out that the life of a feral cat can be a bit torturous, especially in Baker County during winter. The lives of feral cats are much shorter than those of house cats (as much as three times shorter) for good reason. Besides the difficulty of finding adequate shelter, their living conditions subject them to suffering and miserable deaths from accidents with vehicles, attacks by other animals (including humans, dogs, and other cats), poisoning, disease and possible starvation. Is subjecting cats to a dangerous, painful and marginal existence really humane?

Feral Cats Lead A Torturous Existence
(NPS.gov photo)

Cats are not only more likely to be victims of feline disease in the wild, they also spread diseases to other animals and humans. The list is long, but includes such favorites as rabies, toxoplasmosis, cat scratch fever and worms. Is unnecessarily maintaining a large reservoir of these diseases in the feral cat population, from where they can be spread to humans, pet cats, or other animals, a wise and humane policy?

Cats, like most predators, evolved to become efficient killers. Even well fed cats can’t control their instinct to kill when confronted with their natural small animal prey—like that hummingbird whose return you had been patiently waiting for.

Rufous Hummingbirds migrate to Baker City (© Christopher Christie)

Cats are thought to have played an important part in the extinction of 30 species of birds worldwide. Each pet cat is estimated to kill about 32 small animals per year and feral cats, which may number as many as 60 million in the U.S., are thought to kill far more than that. It is estimated that cats kill hundreds of millions of songbirds and over a billion other animals in the U. S. every year. Granted, some of those animals are introduced pests like the house sparrow and starling, which do a good deal of damage themselves, but many are not. Some are neotropical migrants like hummingbirds and warblers, who already have enough troubles surviving in our over-populated, bruised and battered world. Unlike the house sparrow, neotropicals are protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and other victims may be covered by other wildlife protection laws as well. Is enabling the slaughter of birds and other animals by feral cats through the TNR program really humane?

Feral Cats kill millions of birds annually
(Australian Government photo)

There are other problems caused by uncared for cats as well. Some of you may have experienced the unmitigated joy of unknowingly stepping in an unplanned cat box, which previously had been your mulched parking area, before you walk into the house. Others of you may have been welcomed by the delightfully perfumed scent of a large male cat who sprayed down your shed after commandeering it for living quarters. Protecting other small pets and young farm animals from feral cats can also become a vexing problem.

Effectiveness

Arguments are made and studies are cited for both sides with regard to the effectiveness of the programs in reducing feral cat populations. In the absence of definitive studies, logic tells us that euthanasia, in combination with spay-neuter programs and education, is at least as effective as TNR, and it addresses a host of other problems associated with feral cats that TNR does not. Feral cat advocates and animal “rights” activists have deluged the internet with half-baked opinions and studies of the issue, but emotional appeals are more often to be found than facts.

Obviously, the math for a reduction in the cat population per spayed female remains the same whether the cat has been spayed or euthanized, so both methods are beneficial in that respect. Both programs will reduce the population of feral cats over time, but TNR has more uncontrollable variables than euthanasia. For example, TNR depends in part on people who are able and willing to feed feral cat colonies. When feeders, who are often elderly, become ill, die, or simply can no longer bear the costs, cats may starve or disperse. Cats, being smarter than some may assume, also become wary of traps, which makes it difficult to bring them in again for the additional vaccinations which are required for humane treatment and disease control. On the other hand, those with a feral cat problem are motivated to do something about it, and when they trap an animal for euthanasia, it won’t have another chance to outwit someone else who is defending their property from feline offences. An added bonus is that these people don’t bill the city or county for their work. One thing is certain; euthanized cats don’t breed, spray your shed, yowl outside your window at night, or kill your favorite hummingbird at the feeder.


Legal issues


As mentioned previously, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act makes killing neotropical birds and other migratory birds, like hummers, unlawful. There are questions as to whether it is legal to release captured feral cats back into feral status when one knows that these cats will subsequently be responsible for killing migratory birds. Corporations have been convicted for allowing the release of polluting substances that have resulted in the deaths of these birds, so it is not far-fetched to imagine convictions for releasing feral cats back into the community when it is clear that they will resume killing birds, including birds protected by law. The same applies to animals protected by other laws as well.


Additionally there exist applicable Oregon State laws in Title 16, Chapter 167, that protect animals from cruelty, abuse and abandonment. There are questions as to whether persons who maintain cat colonies are providing “minimum care,” which is defined as “care sufficient to preserve the health and well-being of an animal,” including food, water, housing, and veterinary care.

Also, those who release feral cats back into the community may be guilty of animal “abuse,” which is defined to be when a “person intentionally, knowingly or recklessly . . . Causes serious physical injury to an animal; or . . . Cruelly causes the death of an animal.” Intentionally releasing a feral cat, that is known to be an indiscriminate serial killer of dozens of birds and other small animals every year , could easily be interpreted as animal abuse.

Another State law, 167.340, the animal abandonment statute, also states that “A person commits the crime of animal abandonment if the person intentionally, knowingly, recklessly or with criminal negligence leaves a domesticated animal at a location without providing for the animal's continued care.” It is not clear weather some or all feral cats may be defined as domesticated animals.

I do not necessarily agree with all these State laws, but the question I, and others, have is whether or not TNR is in compliance with them.

Costs of TNR Versus Euthanasia

One 2004 study by the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association found that euthanasia was more effective than TNR for managing feral cats. Feral cat activists have tried to shoot down that study by complaining it didn’t factor in cost and public opinion.

One of the efforts tried to show that euthanasia is incredibly expensive by using figures from large cities with established animal shelters, but the study didn’t provide apples to apples comparisons. For euthanasia, they included costs to pick up, house, and dispose of an animal, but they then forgot to include trap, release and other costs when comparing the euthanasia cost to the cost for TNR. In Baker City’s case, the papers report that Baker City vets charge $60 to $70 to spay and between $35 and $45 to neuter. In Baker City, euthanasia fees for cats run between $20.00 to $40.00, and some charge a $10 disposal charge. Animal Clinic at 10th and Campbell, charges a flat $20.00. You do the math. While veterinarians no doubt appreciate the TNR program for a number of altruistic reasons, it should also be noted that it serves their economic interest. There is no doubt though that they could support a lower cost euthanasia program, coupled with a low-cost, donor and City supported spay-neuter program, and so could city taxpayers.

If government would just trust the judgment of the people affected by marauding feral cats, instead of telling them how they must deal with the problem, the cost of a remedy would drop like a rock.

No study that I am aware of has factored in the environmental costs for the slaughter of birds and other small animals into the TNR program, nor have they included costs for feeding and all the necessary vaccinations. Surely no community nuisance costs have been included in TNR comparisons for the time residents spend alleviating the damage done by male cats spraying in once pleasant places (neutered cats still spray), or for deodorizing and vet bills when one’s dog gets in a tangle with a “humane” person’s recently released furry feral friend. These are obviously not costs that would be incurred by a euthanasia program after a feral cat is initially trapped.

Public opinion, may, or may not, be a problem. If the papers would do their job and make the public aware of the pros and cons of each possible solution, then community supported euthanasia, in combination with spay-neuter programs, might not be such a hard sell. This is especially so in a region where hunters abound, and where people are not particularly squeamish about controlling pestiferous animal populations through lethal means. Even with our local media’s one-sided approach, Bakerites may already have serious questions about TNR, and about using their tax dollars in a way that ignores so many problems associated with released feral cats.

Solutions

We all know that ignoring the problem of feral cats won’t make them go away. Recognizing that the TNR program is seriously flawed is obviously not enough. Other programs, that don’t carry the deleterious side effects of TNR, can and should be implemented. The City still needs to deal with feral cats and they can help in several ways.

• The City should contract with one or more local vets for publicly available, inexpensive, spay-neuter and euthanasia services.
• Let citizens take care of the problem without harassment by law enforcement, and irrational feral cat and animal rights advocates by allowing those affected to deal with or bring in strays that are causing problems where they live.
• The City should step forward and fund a low-cost spay-neuter program for low income residents. Animal advocates could do their part by donating to the City’s program and finding grants to support it.
• Begin a continuing education program informing people about irresponsible breeding, keeping cats inside, and the low-cost alternatives available to them.
• If necessary, the city should begin licensing cats, just as they do dogs, and include financial incentives for spay-neutering.


Cats Can Live Happily Indoors

Private donor financed TNR is fine, but the most low cost and humane solution would be to initially let affected citizens solve their own feral cat problem. Taking feral cats to the local vets for euthanasia, rather that spay-neuter and release, will accomplish a part of the population control objectives. That, coupled with owner education and a city financed spay/neuter program to help financially strapped pet owners, will begin to alleviate the problem. Asking cat owners in the city to keep their cats inside would also help prevent breeding, the killing of small animals, and damage to neighboring property. Those who allow their pets to reproduce without a reasonable and realistic plan for finding decent homes for the offspring should not be tolerated. The licensing of domestic cats, as is done with dogs, along with similar financial incentives, such as licensing discounts for owner-initiated spay/neutering, should be used if the first steps don’t bring the necessary results. Licensing cats would also make it easy to know whether a cat is the pet of a legally responsible owner. One thing is for sure--TNR is only an effective and “humane” solution for those whose concern for abandoned cats is far greater than their compassion for other animals or their concern for the community’s health, tranquility, and welfare.

Nobody wants to perpetuate the black barrels I spoke of earlier. Nor do citizens want to be put in the position of having to defend themselves and their animal friends from feral cats and the problems they bring. We don’t want to decide whether it is more humane to kill birds than cats, and through the knowledge gained by education, the help of low-cost, community supported spay/neuter/euthanasia programs, and licensing if necessary, we won’t have to. With a sensible policy, choosing between being humane to cats or humane to other critters, shouldn’t be a problem.


Related articles:

FERAL CAT COLONIES IN FLORIDA: THE FUR AND FEATHERS ARE FLYING
A REPORT TO THE U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE
http://conservation.law.ufl.edu/pdf/feralcat.pdf

Cats and Birds: Keeping Cats Indoors
http://www.umd.umich.edu/dept/rouge_river/cats.html

Kill the Cat That Kills the Bird?
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/02/magazine/02cats-v--birds-t.html?ref=todayspaper

_______________________________________________

Resisting Delisting ~ Idaho's Wolves & Livestock's Influence
This video provides a pretty good window into the mentality of the "shoot, shovel, and shut up" crowd.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1r8PhnTL-c0

_______________________________________________

What do the Candidates Really Think?

Tired of trying to figure out what the candidates think about issues you care about?

Try: http://www.youtube.com/youchoose

This was mentioned as a good source by a media watchdog on last Friday's Bill Moyers program on PBS.